Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28394 (AP)

Y.Raghothama Reddy, v. Sri Bayineni Srinivasulu,

CC/4477/2023 · 2025-07-02

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010404122023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4477/2023 Between: 1. Y.RAGHOTHAMA REDDY,, S/O Y.VENKATA RAMI REDDY, AGE.46 YEARS, OCC. CONTRACTOR, R/O H.NO. 10-119, REDDYS VEEDI, VELDURTHI, KUNOOL TOWN, KURNOOL DISTRICT. A.P ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI BAYINENI SRINIVASULU, REGISTRAR RAYALASEEMA UNIVERSITY, KURNOOL TOWN, KURNOOL DISTRICT. A.P. 2. SRI G G MANOHAR, CHIEF ENGINEER, (APFWIDC), VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. SRI DR POLA BASKAR I A S, STATE PROJECT DIRECTOR, O/O RUSA AND COMMISSIONARETE OF COLLEGE EDUCATION, IIND FLOOR, FLAT NO. 201, GARUDADRI, K.K TOWERS, SRI LAKSHMI NARASIMHA COLONY, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents for gross willful violation of the Final Order dt.26-04- 2023 passed by the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh in W.P.No. 9053 of 2023 Under section 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. C.YELLAIAH Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. K V RAGHU VEER 2. Y RATNA PRABHA (SC FOR RAYALASEEMA UNIVERSITY) The Court made the following: ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for the willful disobedience of the orders dated 26.04.2023 passed in W.P.No.9053 of 2023. 2. Sri P.Nithin Pramod Kumar, learned counsel representing Sri C.Yellaiah, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the orders of this Court, disobedience of which is complained of in this Contempt Case has been complied with and prayed to close the contempt. 3. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 03rd July, 2025 RKS