APHC010008592020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 472 OF 2020 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, aggrieved by the Order and Decree dated 05.09.2019 made in 1A.No. 302 of 2019 in O.S.No. 500 of 2013 on the file of I Additional Senior Civil Judge. Visakhapatnam Between: Smt. Velivela Sri Rama Lakshmi, W/o Late V. 81 years, Residing at D.No. 49-33-38, “ hondam Vinayakudi Temple Street, Visakhapatnam. Kameshwara Rao, Aged about Ramakrishna Nagar, Akkayyapalem, T ...Petitioner/Petitioner/Defendant No.6 AND 1. Velivela Jagannadha Rao. S/o Late V. Viswanadham D.No.49-33-38, Ramakrishan Nagar, Akkayyapalem Temple Street, Visakhapatnam - 530 016. Aged 81 years, R/o. Thondam Vinayakudi Respondent/Respondent Plaintiff 2. V Kameshara Rao, (DIED) 3. Velivela Rama Rao, S/o. Late Viswanadham. Hindu, aged about 78 yers, lo. D.No.49-33-38, Ramakrishan Nagar, Akkayyapalem, Thondam Vinayakudi Temple Street, Visakhapatnam - 530 016. 4. Vemalakonnda Chittemma, W/o. Ranga Bhupal years, /o. D.No.49-33-38, Ramakrishan Nagar, Vinayakudi Temple Street, Visakhapatnam - 530 016 , Hindu, aged about 76 Akkayyapalem, Thondam 5. Smt Medapati Subhadra, W/o. Devaraj Kumar, Hindu, aged about 74 years, /o. D.No.49-33-38, Ramakrishan Nagar, Akkayyapalem, Thondam Vinayakudi Temple Street, Visakhapatnam - 530 016. 6. Smt^Pydipathi Kanaka Mahalakshmi, W/o. PVN Prasad 65 years, Pogulavari Street, Thagapuvalasa, Visakhapatnam District. ...Respondents/Respondents/Defendant Nos.1 to 5 Hindu, aged about lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in O.S.No. 500 of 2013 on the file of I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI O UDAYA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: The Court made the following order: '/ V'' APHC010008592020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 472/2020 {3505] Between: 1.VELIVELA SRI RAMA LAKSHMI, W/O LATE V. AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS, RAMAKRISHNA KAMESHWARA RAO, RESIDING AT D.NO. 49-33-38 NAGAR, AKKAYYAPALEM, T HONDAM VINAYAKUDI TEMPLE STREET, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1.VELIVELA JAGANNADHA RAO, S/0 LATE V. VISWANADHAM, AGED 81 YEARS, R/0. D.NO.49-33- 38, RAMAKRISHAN NAGAR, AKKAYYAPALEM, THONDAM VINAYAKUDI TEMPLE STREET* VISAKHAPATNAM - 530 016. 2.V KAMESHARA RAO, (DIED) 3.VELIVELA RAMA RAO, S/0. LATE VISWANADHAM HINDU, AGED ABOUT 78 YERS, /O. D.NO.49-33-38.’ akkayyapalem! TEMPLE STREET, RAMAKRISHAN THONDAM VINAYAKUDI VISAKHAPATNAM - 530 016. 4.VEMALAKONNDA BHUPAL, D.NO.49-33-38, NAGAR CHITTEMMA, W/O. RANGA HINDU, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, /O. RAMAKRISHAN NAGAR, AKKAYYAPALEM, THONDAM VINAYAKUDI TEMPLE STREET, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530 016 5.SMT MEDAPATI SUBHADRA, W/O. KUMAR, D.NO.49-33-38, AKKAYYAPALEM. THONDAM VINAYAKUDI TEMPLE STREET, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530 016. 6.SMT PYDIPATHI KANAKA MAHALAKSHMI, W/O PVN PRASAD, POGULAVARI STREET, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. DEVARAJ HINDU, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, /O. RAMAKRISHAN NAGAR, HINDU. AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, THAGAPUVALASA. ...RESPONDENT(S): Memorandum of Civil Revision PetLn urder and Decree dated 05.09.2019 2019 in O.S.No. 500 of 2013 Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam jA NO: 1 OF 9090 circumsti;’ces‘'s?ate(f?n m". 'll 1.0 UDAYA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): The Court made the following: aggrieved t y the made in 1A.No. 302 of on the file of I Additional Senior % ORDER: The present revision is filed against the order dated 05.09.2019 passed in l.A.No.302 of 2019 in O.S.No.500 of 2013 the file of the learned I Additional Senior Civil Judge, on Visakhapatnam. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that, the cause in the revision petition 2. does not survive. The submission is placed on record. 3. In view of the same, nothing survives to be adjudicated in the instant revision and accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 4. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/-B PRASADA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. The I Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam. 2. One CC to SRI. O. UDAYA KUMAR, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CD Copies nm HIGH COURT DATED:11/07/2025 ORDER >■ CRP NO. 472 OF 2020 0 5 AUG 2025 ^NCigrent Sectjonxv «o DISMISSING THE CRP AS INFRUCTUOUS