VEER SINGH S/O SHRI BAJRANG SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/12588/2025 · 2025-08-21
Maneesh Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28386 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28386 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:33059] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12588/2025 Veer Singh S/o Shri Bajrang Singh, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Raja Ji Ka Bas, Lal Diggi, Alwar, Presently Working As Senior Physical Teacher In Government Senior Secondary School, Tuleda, Block Umren, District Alwar. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Collector Cum District Election Officer, Alwar, District Alwar.
2. The Electoral Registration Officer (Sdm), Alwar Rural (065), District Alwar.
3. Principal, Government Senior Secondary School, Tuleda Block Umrain, District Alwar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Pathak For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA
Order 21/08/2025
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the controversy involved in the present case is squarely covered by an
order dated 22.07.2025, passed by a Single Bench of this Court at the principal seat, Jodhpur, in a batch of writ petitions led by S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12975/2025: Ten Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.
2.
Learned counsel, therefore, prays that the petitioner may be permitted to file a detailed representation before the competent authorities for redressal of his grievances.
3. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation in the
[2025:RJ-JP:33059] (2 of 2) [CW-12588/2025] office of respondent No.3 and the respondent No.3 is directed to decide the same within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of such representation; and if the case of the petitioner falls within the purview of the law laid down in the case of Ten Singh (supra); the same shall be decided in terms of the said
judgment.
4. The order has been passed based on the submissions made in the petition, the respondents would be free to examine the veracity of the submissions made in the petition, and only if the averments made therein are found to be correct, the petitioner would be entitled to the relief sought.
5. Stay application and other pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of, accordingly.
(MANEESH SHARMA),J SOURAV-27