Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:85668 Court No. - 86 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8492 of 2025 Applicant :- Shadab Hussain Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Syed Ali Imam Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Chandan Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. By means of the instant bail application, the applicant, Shadab Hussain, seeks bail in Case Crime No. 02 of 2025, under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2) of B.N.S. and Section 66D of I.T. Act, Police Station Cyber Crime, District Gautam Buddh Nagar. 3. The F.I.R. was lodged against two persons namely Alisha and Naresh Mishra, with the allegation that both the accused cheated the informant to the tune of Rs. 26,11,727/- in the name of internet trading. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is not named in the F.I.R. During the course of investigation the Investigating found that the money was transferred in the account of one Kuldeep Giri, who also transferred more than two lakh rupees in the account of the present applicant. Thereafter, Kuldeep Giri and the present applicant were arrested. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that none of the bank account wherein the first informant transferred his money belongs to the applicant. Nothing incriminating article was recovered from the possession of applicant at the time of his arrest and false recovery has been implanted upon the applicant with no independent witness. There is no credible evidence against the applicant except the confessional statement of co-accused, Kuldeep Giri. The applicant is in jail since 22.02.2025, with no criminal history. 5. Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail by contending that the money was transferred into the account of applicant several times, therefore, there is active participation of applicant in the commission of offence, therefore, he does not deserve to be enlarged on bail. 6. Keeping in view submissions of learned counsel for the parties, gravity of offence, nature of allegations and all the attending facts and circumstances of the case including the fact that the co- accused, Kuldeep Giri transferred the money of the informant in the account of the applicant several times, therefore, there is active participation of applicant in the commission of offence. The present bail application has no merit and deserves to be rejected. 7. Accordingly, the present bail application filed on behalf of applicant-Shadab Hussain, is rejected. Order Date :- 21.5.2025 Mustaqeem. Digitally signed by :- MOHD MUSTAQEEM KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad