2025:JHHC:17446 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 7628 of 2024 1. Bablu Quraishi @ Md. Jhangir Quraishi @ Md. Jahangir Quraishi, S/o Murtaza Quraishi, R/o village Vishanpur, PO and PS-Pachamba, District Giridih. 2. Md. Asif Ali @ Mohammad Asif Ali, S/o Ahmad Quraishi, R/o Quraishi Mohalla, Giridih,P O Giridih, PS Giridih (Town), District Giridih. ….. Petitioner(s). Versus The State of Jharkhand ….. Opposite Party ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prabhat Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Abhay Kumar Tiwari, APP ----- 05/01.07.2025: This is an application filed by the petitioners praying for grant of anticipatory bail in terms of sections 482 and 484 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, as the petitioners have been allegedly implicated in connection with Giridih(T) PS Case No. 176 of 2024, for the offences punishable under sections 127(1)/ 115(2)/ 118(2)/ 109/303/351(2)/329(4)/ 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Giridih. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State. 3. The learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. 4. As per FIR the allegation is that these petitioners and others entered in the house of the informant and assaulted the family members including the son of the informant. There is allegation of use of knife and other weapons in the assault. 5. Considering the fact that there is an allegation of assault and there are injuries, I am not inclined to allow the present anticipatory bail application. However, if the petitioners appears in Court, their cases will be considered considering the individual overt act alleged against each of the petitioners and the corresponding injury arising out of the said overt act. The court concerned will also consider as to whether the ingredients of section 109 of BNS is applicable so far as these petitioners are concerned and thereafter after such consideration, appropriate order will be passed. 6. Thus, the present anticipatory bail application is disposed of. 7. Application for early hearing is dismissed as infructuous. (ANANDA SEN, J. ) KNR/