IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.891 of 2024 Date of Decision: 25.2.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Vikram Singh Hada ……...Petitioner Versus Rajesh Sharma and Anr. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. Jeevesh Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, states that mandate contained in the judgment alleged to have been violated stands duly complied with and as such, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings. 2. Consequently, in view of the above, present petition is disposed of. Notices discharged. February 25, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (manjit) Judge