RAJ PAL SINGH SON OF SHRI SATYENDRA PAL SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/13816/2023 · 2025-01-23
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, Shubha Mehta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28378 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28378 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:3413-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13816/2023 Raj Pal Singh Son Of Shri Satyendra Pal Singh, Aged About 55 Years, Resident Of Q-72, N.r.i. Colony, Pratap Nagar, Sanganer, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)-302005
2. Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)-302005
3. Chief
Engineer, Water
Resources
Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Sinchai Bhawan, Sawai Bhawani Singh Road, Jaipur (Raj.)-302005
4. Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Through Its Secretary, Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Jaipur Road, Ghooghara Ghati, Madarpura, Ajmer (Raj.)-305001.
5. Pradeep Rustagi S/o. Shri Om Prakash Rustagi, Presently Working As Additional Chief Engineer, R/o. I/ii, Ignp Colony, Bikaner. ----Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Rajendra Soni Advocate with Mr. Vishal Soni Advocate. For Respondents : Mr. Rajendra Prasad Advocate General with Ms. Harshita Thakral Advocate and Ms. Dhriti Laddha Advocate. Mr. Shobhit Tiwari Advocate. Mr. Govind Gupta Advocate on behalf of Mr. M.F. Baig Advocate.
[2025:RJ-JP:3413-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-13816/2023] HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA Order 23/01/2025
1. Learned Advocate General, at the outset, would submit that in the changed circumstances, the respondents are going to consider the petitioner’s case as the senior most Additional Chief Engineer for promotion to the next higher post of Chief Engineer.
2. In that view of the matter, we are not inclined to keep this petition pending and placing on record the statement of learned Advocate General, dispose off the petition with direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner as senior most Additional Chief Engineer. Validity of the rules shall be examined in an appropriate case.
3. Petition is, accordingly, disposed off.
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ MANOJ NARWANI-DAKSH /27