2025:JHHC:22188 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 1757 of 2018 1. Anil Ram, aged about 43 years, son of Madan Ram, resident of Village - Haldipokhar, P.O. - Haldipokhar, PS-Kowali, District - East Singhbhum (Jharkhand) 2. Nilesh Ram, aged about 36 years, son of Madan Ram, resident of Village - Haldipokhar, P.O. - Haldipokhar, PS-Kowali, District - East Singhbhum (Jharkhand) 3. Binod Ram, aged about 57 years, son of Bihari Ram, resident of Village Haldipokhar, P.O. - Haldipokhar, PS-Kowali, District - East Singhbhum (Jharkhand) ….. Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Pawan Kumar, S/o Late Arun Dev Prasad, R/o Vazerganj, P.O. & P.S. – Vazirganj, District – Gaya Bihar PIN 805131 …... Opposite Parties With Cr. Revision No. 1702 of 2018 1. Sunil Ram @Sunil Kumar Ram, aged about 45 years, son of Madan Ram; 2. Pankaj Kumar, aged about 35 years, son of Madan Ram: 3. Rohit Ram @ Rohit Kumar Ram, aged about 36 years, son of Sadan Ram; 4. Neha Kumari, aged about 26 years, daughter of Binod Ram; 5. Nidhi Kumari, aged about 29 years, daughter of Binod Ram; 6. Sadan Ram @ Sadam Ram, aged about 68 years, son of late Bihari Ram; 7. Mamta Devi, aged about 48 years, wife of Sadan Ram; 8. Kiran Devi @Kiran, aged about 49 years, wife of Binod Ram; All residing at Village Haldipokhar, P.O.-Haldipokhar, PS- Kowali, District East Singhbhum, PIN 831002 (Jharkhand) ….. Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Pawan Kumar, S/o Late Arun Dev Prasad, R/o Vazerganj, P.O. & P.S. – Vazerganj, District – Gaya Bihar PIN 805131 …... Opposite Parties ---- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioners :- Mr. Amit Kr. Das, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Ravi Kerketta, SC-VI :- Mr. Deepika Jojower, AC to SC-VI For the Informant :- Ms. Rishi Bharti, Advocate ---- 22/06.08.2025 Mr. Amit Kumar Das, after some arguments, on instruction, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners in both the cases seeks permission to withdraw these Cr. Revision Applications with liberty to raise all the grounds at appropriate stage. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the State and the informant have got no objection. 3. Accordingly, these Cr. Revision Applications are dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 4. Pending Interlocutory application, if any, also stand disposed of. 5. Interim order, if any, also stands vacated. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) R.Kumar