IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No.311 of 2025 ----- K. Susheela Devi, wife of Jainul Khan, resident of Flat No. 1, Ground Floor, Mahanidhi Apartment, Sukantopally, Rupnarayanpur, PO and PS Rupnarayanpur, District Paschim Bardhaman, West Bengal … Petitioner(s). Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Mr. Uma Shankar Singh, Secretary, Primary Education and Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, PO-Dhurwa, PS Jagannathpur, District Ranchi 3.Mr. Aditya Ranjan, Director, Primary Education and Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, PO-Dhurwa, PS Jagannathpur, District Ranchi 4.Smt. Kumud Sahay, Deputy Commissioner, Jamtara 5.Mr. Bikesh Kunal Prajapati, District Superintendent of Education, Jamtara 6.Mr. Rajkumar Agrawal, Accountant General (A&E), Jharkhand, PO and PS Doranda, District Ranchi … Opposite Party(s). CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Durga C. Mishra, Advocate For the Opp. Party(s) : Mrs. Richa Sanchita, Advocate …...... 05 /28.02.2025: The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an order has been passed in favour of the petitioner but the consequential benefits which has been ordered to be extended to the petitioner has not been paid. 2. Considering the submission made by the petitioner, I am of the opinion that no contempt is made out. 3. However the respondents, as mentioned in the speaking order, should disburse the consequential benefits as early as possible. 4. The contempt application is dropped. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Tanuj/