++ |` IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl MONDAY ,THE HGHTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST .t TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE .-PRESENT.- THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8155 OF 2025 Between : 1. On{eddu Raja Gopal Reddy, s/o o. pedda Ranga Reddy, Aged about 36 years, occ cultivation, R/o D.No.1-264, SajjaladI'nne vlllage, TadI'Patri Mandal, Ananthapuramu Dt, AP, Ce" 9701044046 2`. SeemakaIIu Rama chandra alias Talari Rama chandra, s/o s. RamanjI'neyulu, Aged about 35 years, occ cooH R/o D.No. 1-162, sajjaladI-nne VI'Ilage, TadI'Pa{rl- MandaI Ananthapuramu Dt, AP, Ce" 6302936133 (A-10) I . . PetjtI-Oners/A2 and AI C AND The State of Andhra pradesh, Through SHO, Tadl-patrl' Rural police station, Rep by public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra pradesh, at Amaravati , ...Respondent/complainanE petition under sections 480 & 483 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed jn support of the crI'minal Petitl'on, the High court may be pleased to grant regular ba" to the petitioners/ Accused No 02 anc! 10 jn CrI-me No.84/2025 of TadI-Patri Rural poll'ce station, on such terms and conditl-ons as this Honorable Court deem fit to impose the facts of thl-s case, so as to secure the ends of just,-ce. The PetltiOn coming on for hearing, upon perusl-ng the petition and the memorandum of grounds filed ,-n support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of SRI THANDAVA YOGESH Advocate for the petjtI'Oners, and of PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, for the Respondent, the court macle the foIIowlng -__. i .ITS:S:- 2 'gr, The Court made the following ORDER: The Criminal Petition has been filed under Sect-IOnS 437 and 439 of the code of crim|lnal procedure,1973 (for brevity [the Cr.P.C.I)/ Sections 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity lthe BNSS'), seeking tO enlarge the petitioners/Accused Nos.2 & `10 on bail in crime No.84 of 2025 of Tadipatri Rural Police Station, Ananthapuramu, registered against the petitioners/Accused Nos.2 & 10 herein for the offences punishable under sections 118(1),109(1) read with Section 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity lthe BNS]). 2. 2. The case of the Prosecution iS that On 07.05.2025 at 4.45 PM at Anjaneya slab factory, Sajjaladinne Vilalge of Tadipatri Mandal, due tO disputes between the parties, the Accused Nos.1 to 10 were went tO complainant in Black coloured Scorpio vehicle, aSSaulted the COmPlainant with deadly weapons i.e., sickles and iron road With an intention tO kill him and thereby caused bleeding injury On his head and over his body. Then the compla'lnant shifted to Government Hopsital, Tadipatri for treatment. Basing on the Statement given by the de faCfo COmPIainant, the aforementioned crime was registered against the accused. 3. Mr.Thandava Yogesh, the learned COunSel for the Petit-lOnerS contends that the petitioners are innocent of the alleged offence and have been falsely implicated by the police. The petitioners are permanent reS'ldentS Of Tadipatri t `_I \* # 3 VP.) Mandal ofAnanthapuramu District and they undertake to strictly adhere to any conditions that may be imposed by thl's court. Learned counsel further submits that the petI-tiOnerS Were arrested on 05.06.2025 and they have been in judicial custody for the past 74 days and it is urged to enlarge the petitioners/Accused Nos|2 & 10 on bail. 4. Ms.P.Akhila Naidu, the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that material portion of the investigation l's completed. 5. , Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. Perused the record. 6. As seen from the record, the petitioners/ Accused No.2 & 10 were arrested on 05.06.2025 and they have been in judicial custody for the past 74 days. Accused No.9 has lodged a report against the present de facfo complainant in Crime No.87 of 2025. The Accused in Crime No.87 of 2025 were also enlarged on bail. So far, nine (9) witnesses have been examined. Wound certificate is not yet received by the Investigating Officer for the past 74 days. Of course, arrest of Accused Nos.1, 3 to 9 I-S not affected. Material porti'on of the investigation is completed. The petitioners are permanent residents of Tadipatri Mandal of Ananthapuramu District. Main witnesses were examined. Their statement under section 161 Cr.P.C is corroborating with the version of the de facfo complainant I'n the FIR. Hence, the chance of Petitioners threatening the witnesses to state something agal-nst them before the Investigating OffI-Cer are diminished. \ d'' __- _ k--.--, - .- 7. Considering the nature and gravity of the Offence, the alleged role played by the petitioners herein and the period of ju`dicial custody undergone by the petitioners, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail w'lth the following stringent conditions: i. The petitioners/Accused Nos.2 & 10 shall be enlarged on bail subject to they executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten thousand only), each with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Tadipatri. ii. The petitioners/Accused Nos.2 & 10 shall appear before the Tadipatri Rural Police Station, Ananthapuramu on every Saturday in between 10:00 am and 05:00 pm, till cognizance is taken by the learned the Trial Court. iii. The petitioners/Accused Nos.2 & 10 shall not leave the liinits of the District without prior permission from the Station House Officer concerned. iv. The petitioners/Accused Nos.2 & 10 shall not commit or indulge in commission of any offence in future. v. The petitioners/Accused Nos.2 & 10 shall cooperate w'lth the investigating officer in further investigation of the case and shall make themselves available for interrogation by the investigating officer as and when required. f==JCr.,,=--so 5 vJ The petJt,oners/Accused No~s2 & 10 she" not, dJrect/y or ndJrec{'y, make any ,nducement, threat or promlse to any person acqua,n{ed w,th the facts of the case so as to dJSSuade A,m/her > from a,sc'os,ng such facts {o the court or {o any POJ,ce offi,cer AccordI'ng'y, the cr,-mjnal petl-I,Ion js allowed. llTF`UE copyll For sD/I M.SRINIVAS := : :::ANREiG:€R=RA R The Jud,c,a/ Mag,strafe off,rsf c/ass, Tad,path, The supenn{endenf, D,sir,cf Ja,/, Ananthapuramu, Ananfhapuramu District The eta+i^- 3 :hn=nthsatpa:lroanm D:s:::{e a:fleer, Tadlpatrl Rural £nanthapuram Dist:i:i I::'=:=Iu:.I:I.C_i - ' -`-l '`uraI Police station`1 one cc to sR/ THANDAVA yoGESH Advocate TOPUcJ T=*u:T:CpCasretocnpn:,B L I c `puRn:sAEYcOuGTEoSRT AH:gVhocca:eu :toopfuAC: a h ra p ra dos h [OUT] one spare coI\y `,`.1 l=.-_I \ a HIGH COURT DR.YLR,J DATED:18/08/2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.8155 of 2025 ALLOWED .._~q.-`~