Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2837 (GAU)

NUR ALOM SK v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

Bail Appln./4000/2025 · 2026-01-19

Rajesh Mazumdar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010271892025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./4000/2025 NUR ALOM SK SO LT KASOM ALI, R/O CHOURANGIMORE, WARD NO 13, PS GAURIPUR, DIST DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN 783331 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. SANU HUSSAIN, MS J A RAHMAN,MS P BARMAN,MR K THAKUR Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER Date : 20.01.2026 Heard Mr. K. Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K. K. Parasar, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State respondent. The learned Addl. Public Prosecutor has submitted that charge sheet has already been submitted vide C.S. No. 457/2025 dated 23.11.2025. Page No.# 2/2 The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he may be granted an opportunity to appear before the Trial Court to pray for regular bail in view of the fact that the charge has already been submitted vide C.S. No. 457/2025 dated 23.11.2025 in connection with Gauripur P.S. Case No. 414/2025 registered under Sections 22(c)/22(b)/ 25/29 of the NDPS Act. Without determining the merits of the argument of the learned counsel for the petitioner regarding validity of the notice under Section 48 of BNSS, 2023, the present bail application is closed allowing the petitioner to appear before the learned Trial Court with appropriate bail application. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is the father of 3 years old child, which requires taking care of the child. The same grounds may be agitated before the learned Trial Court. With the above observations, the bail application stands closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant