APHC010403452025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 20687/2025 Between: 1. CHEPPALI GANDHI BABU, S/O. LATE PULLAIAH, AGED 42 YEARS, R/O. DOOR NO. 7/133, KONDAYAPALLE VILLAGE, KAMALAPURAM MANDAL, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT. 2. CHEPPALI RAMESH, S/O. LATE PULLAIAH, AGED 41 YEARS, R/O. DOOR NO. 7/133, KONDAYAPALLE VILLAGE, KAMALAPURAM MANDAL, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. CHEPPALI RAJENDRA PRASAD,, S/O. LATE PULLAIAH, AGED 38 YEARS, R/O. DOOR NO. 7/133, KONDAYAPALLE VILLAGE, KAMALAPURAM MANDAL, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT AT KADAPA. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KADAPA REVENUE DIVISION, KADAPA, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, KAMALAPURAM MANDAL, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT. 5. THE MANDAL SURVEYOR, KAMALAPURAM MANDAL, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents 4 and 5 in insisting petitioners to vacate from their agricultural landed property admeasuring an extent of Ac. 1.36 cents in Sy.No.961 of Chinna Cheppali Revenue Village in 2 Kamalapuram Mandal of Y.S.R. Kadapa District at the instance of local political leaders under the guise of notice in Rc.No.B/95/2025, dated 01.04.2025, without following due process as mandated by law, as illegal, irregular, irrational, without jurisdiction and violative of principles of Natural Justice and offends Articles 14 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere in any manner with petitioners possession and enjoyment of aforesaid lands and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to suspend the operation of notice 01.04.2025 vide Rc.No.B/95/2025 issued by the 4th respondent and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere in any manner with petitioners’ possession and enjoyment of their agricultural landed property admeasuring an extent of Ac. 1.36 cents in Sy.No.961 of Chinna cheppali Revenue Village in Kamalapuram Mandal of Y.S.R. Kadapa District, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. RAJENDRA C Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 20687 of 2025 ORDER: The present Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents 4 and 5 in insisting petitioners to vacate from their agricultural landed property admeasuring an extent of Ac. 1.36 cents in Sy.No.961 of Chinna Cheppali Revenue Village in Kamalapuram Mandal of Y.S.R. Kadapa District at the instance of local political leaders under the guise of notice in Rc.No.B/95/2025, dated 01.04.2025, without following due process as mandated by law, as illegal, irregular, irrational, without jurisdiction and violative of principles of Natural Justice and offends Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere in any manner with petitioners possession and enjoyment of aforesaid lands and pass such other order or orders as this Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case”. 2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, on instructions, submits that the respondents will follow the due procedure while dispossess of the petitioner from the subject property. 3. In view of the above said submission, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondents to examine the explanation submitted by the petitioner to the impugned notice, dated 02.04.2025 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law and communicate the said decision to the petitioner herein. Till such time, no coercive steps shall be taken by the respondents against the subject property. 4 4. With the above said observation, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 06.08.2025 SPP 5 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHARA RAO W.P.No. 20687 OF 2025 Date: 06.08.2025 SPP