Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28367 (RAJ)

MAHENDER SINGH S/O SHRI CHHAJURAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/10989/2025 · 2025-09-03

Anil Kumar Upman

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:35404] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10989/2025 Mahender Singh S/o Shri Chhajuram, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Village Chatarpura, P.S. Bansdayal, District Kotputli-Behror (Rajasthan) (Presently Confined In Central Jail Alwar Since 21.7.2025). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 03/09/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.60/2025 registered at Police Station Bansur, District Kotputli-Behror for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 316(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that a civil dispute has been given colour of criminal offence. He further submits that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. He argues that other co-accused person namely, Manoj Kumar has already been granted benefit of bail by this Court. He further argues that charge-sheet has already been filed, there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. He contends that the petitioner is in custody since 21.07.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. [2025:RJ-JP:35404] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-10989/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; other co-accused person has been granted benefit of bail by this Court; charge-sheet has been filed; absence of criminal antecedents and trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner – Mahender Singh S/o Shri Chhajuram shall be released on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/130