1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5088 of 2025 1 - Smt. Varsha Hardaha W/o Shri Pavan Kumar Hardaha Aged About 36 Years Occupation - Assistant Teacher (L.B.), Government Primary School Kesla, Block Division - Korba, District - Korba (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Public Instruction Directorate, Chhattisgarh First Floor, C-Block, Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Joint Director Education Department Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - Collector Korba, District - Korba (C.G.) 5 - Secretary District Rationalization Committee (District Education Officer), Korba, District - Korba (C.G.) 6 - Sub-Divisional Magistrate (Revenue) Korba, District - Korba (C.G.) 7 - Block Education Officer Korba, District - Korba (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nikhil Wadhwani, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Khulesh Sahu, Panel Lawyer SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Digitally signed by SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Date: 2025.07.03 11:02:57 +0530 2 Hon'ble Justice Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J. Order on Board 02/07/2025 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following relief(s): "10.1 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition and quash the impugned order dated 31.05.2025 (Annexure-P/1) and impugned order dated 04.06.2025 (Annexure- P/2) which relates to order of transfer of the petitioner 55 kms away from the present place of posting i.e. from Government Primary School Kesla Block Division Korba to Primary School Chhindkona Block Division Korba. 10.2 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent to post the petitioner at the nearest Vacant Single Teacher Primary School in accordance with law i.e. at Primary School Ompur. 10.3 That, any other relief which this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper may also kindly be granted to the petitioner in the interest of justice along with cost of the petition." 2. When the matter has been called up for hearing, the learned State counsel on instruction would submit that the authorities have considered the case of the petitioner and suitable order has been passed and the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed. 3. The submissions made by learned State counsel is not disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner 4. On the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge sagrika