104 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 843 of 2019 (O&M) Date of Decision: 23.07.2025 Jaiveer and another .......... Petitioners Versus Amit Khatri, IAS, Deputy Commissioner, District Jind .......... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Ms. Manisha Nehra, Advocate for Mr. Vijay Pal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sandeep Chhabra, Additional Advocate General, Haryana for the respondent. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the respondents submits that speaking order dated 06.11.2018 has been passed while making necessary compliance on behalf of the respondent; thus, no cause survives in the present petition. [2] On the other hand, learned counsel for the petitioners raises grievance that the petitioners have not been adequately compensated. [3] I have heard learned counsel for the parties. [4] In the considered opinion of this Court, the issue of quantum cannot be adjudicated upon in the contempt jurisdiction; as such, the petitioners shall be at liberty to avail remedy as per law. [5] Disposed off accordingly. [6] Rule stands discharged. [7] Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed off. July 23, 2025 ( HARKESH MANUJA ) 'dk kamra' JUDGE Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Dinesh Kumar 2025.07.23 17:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document