Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28355 (ALL)

RAHUL v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

BAIL/22414/2023 · 2025-07-31

Samit Gopal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:129092 Court No. - 64 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 22414 of 2023 Applicant :- Rahul Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Ashish Pandey,Nikil Pathak,Sunil Kumar Mishra,Upendra Vikram Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J. 1. List revised. 2. Heard Sri Abhishek Tiwari holding brief of Sri Nikhil Pathak, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri V.D. Ojha, learned counsel for the State. 3. This bail application under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by the applicant Rahul seeking enlargement on bail during trial in connection with Case Crime No.468 of 2018, u/s 376-D, 506 IPC and 3/4 POCSO Act and 3(2)5 of SC/ST Act, P.S. Baghpat, District Baghpat. 4. This is a third bail application. The first bail application on behalf of the applicant was rejected by this Court vide order dated 4.2.2021 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.29527 of 2019. Thereafter the second bail application on behalf of the applicant was also rejected vide order dated 18.10.2022 passed by this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.37619 of 2021. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant states that the present bail application has become infructuous as the trial in the matter has concluded, hence the present bail application be dismissed as having become infructuous. 6. As prayed by learned counsel for the applicant, the present bail application is dismissed as infructuous. (Samit Gopal, J.) Order Date :- 1.8.2025 Gaurav Kuls Digitally signed by :- GAURAV KULSHRESTHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad