- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21377 CRP No. 452 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 452 OF 2024 (IO) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. H.M. NARAYANA, S/O LATE CHIKKAMUNILINGAIAH, AGE: 52 YEARS 2. SRI. H.M. MUNIRAJU S/O LATE CHIKKAMUNILINGAIAH, AGE: 51 YEARS, 3. SRI. H.M. BASAVARAJU, S/O LATE CHIKKAMUNILINGAIAH, AGE: 50 YEARS, 4. SRI. ASHWATHAIAH, S/O LATE CHIKKAMUNILINGAIAH, AGE: 46 YEARS, ALL ARE R/AT HEJJAL VILLAGE BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANAGAR – 562 109. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. B. RAVINDRA PRASAD, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. LAKSHAMAMMA, W/O LATE SIDDAPPA, Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21377 CRP No. 452 of 2024 AGE: 53 YEARS, R/AT HEJJAL VILLAGE, BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANAGAR – 562 109. 2. SMT. NAGARATHNA, W/O LATE BYRAPPA, AGE: 41 YEARS, R/AT: SONNENAHALLI VILLAGE, KENGERI HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK - 560 060. 3. SMT. SANNATHIMMAKKA, W/O LATE CHIKKAMUNILINGAIAH, AGE: 76 YEARS, R/AT: HEJJAL VILLAGE, BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANAGARA – 562 109. 4. SMT. HOMBAKKA W/O LATE CHIKKAMUNILINGAIAH, AGE: 58 YEARS, R/AT: KODIYALA VILLAGE, KARENAHALLI GRAMA, BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANGARA - 562 109. …RESPONDENTS THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 27.07.2023 PASSED ON I.A IN OS.NO.60/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE IST ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, RAMANAGARA, REJECTING THE I.A. FILED UNDER ORDER DATED 7 RULE 11 OF CPC, FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21377 CRP No. 452 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER This Court on 05.06.2025, passed a peremptory order, which reads as follows: “One week's time is granted to comply with the office objections. If office objections are complied with, Office to post the matter on the ensuing Thursday. In the event, office objections are not complied with, the petition would be dismissed for its non-prosecution." 2. Even today, office objections are not complied with. 3. Therefore, the petition is dismissed for its non-prosecution. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE SJK List No.: 2 Sl No.: 6 CT: BHK