- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22414 WP No. 17262 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.17262 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. GANGAMMA W/O. SRI CHIKKA GANGAPPA AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS RESIDING AT MARASANDRA VILLAGE (KADATHANAMALE DAKALE) HESARAGHATTA HOBLI YELAHANKA TALUK BENGALURU DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI VARADARAJA P.N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT BENGALURU-560 009. 3. THE ASSITANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU NORTH SUB-DIVISION BENGALURU-560 009. 4. THE TAHSILDAR YELAHANKA TALUK MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA YELAHANKA, BENGALURU-560 064. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKHAR, AGA) Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22414 WP No. 17262 of 2025 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 7-1-2025 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER COPY OF WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-C TO MEET THE ENDS OF JUSTICE. THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER The learned AGA accepts notice for respondents. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. In this writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner is with regard to consider the representation dated 07.01.2025 (Annexure-C). Having taken note of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the land in question has been granted in favour of the petitioner as per registered Sale Deed dated 05.12.2012 and in that view of the matter, Respondent No.4 is directed to consider the representation dated - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22414 WP No. 17262 of 2025 07.01.2025 (Annexure-C), in accordance with law, at the earliest within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE DH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39