Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28340 (PNJ)

MAHINDER SINGH ALIAS PATWARI v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

CRWP/1800/2025 · 2025-05-05

N S Shekhawat

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

136 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-W-545-2025,CRM-W-546-2025 IN/AND CRWP-1800-2025 Date of Decision:05.05.2025 Mahinder Singh @ Patwari …Petitioner vs. State of Haryana and others …Respondents Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present: Mr. Suram Singh Rana, Advocate with Mr. Sarvesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate for the applicant/petitioner. Mr. Rajinder Kumar Banku, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) CRM-W-545-2025 Prayer in the present application filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C for preponment of the main case. Notice of the application. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Rajinder Kumar Banku, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, who is present in the Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record carefully. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed; the date of hearing in the main case is preponed from 14.07.2025 to today itself and the main case is taken up on Board today itself. HITESH 2025.05.05 16:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh CRM-W-545-2025,CRM-W-546-2025 IN/AND CRWP-1800-2025 CRWP-1800-2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that at this stage, he shall be satisfied in case, appropriate directions are issued to respondents to decide his case for grant of pre-mature release in terms of the judgment (Annexure A-1) passed by this Court in Criminal Writ Petition No.8232 of 2022, titled as “Pohlu @Polu Ram Vs. State of Haryana and others”. On the other hand learned State counsel has no serious objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. Consequently, at this stage, the respondent No.1 is directed to decide the case of the petitioner for pre-mature release in the light of the judgment passed by this Court in the matter of “Pohlu @Polu Ram Vs. State of Haryana and others” by passing a speaking and reasoned order within a period of four weeks from today. The petition stands diposed off. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s), disposed of, accordingly. (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 05.05.2025 JUDGE hitesh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HITESH 2025.05.05 16:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh