Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28338 (AP)

GORLA SATYANARAYANA REDDY v. VALLABHANENI RAMPRASAD

AS/503/2024 · 2025-04-03

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam, Ravi Nath Tilhari

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 (RNT,J & MRK,J A.S. NO.503 OF 2024) APHC010402832024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3524] THURSDAY ,THE THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM FIRST APPEAL NO: 503/2024 Between: Gorla Satyanarayana Reddy and Others ...APPELLANT(S) AND Vallabhaneni Ramprasad ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. K RATHANGA PANI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. MANGENA SREE RAMA RAO The Court made the following: JUDGMENT:- (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) Heard Sri Chandra Sekhar Reddy, learned counsel representing Sri K.Rathangapani Reddy, learned counsel for the appellants and Sri Mangena Sree Rama Rao, learned counsel for the respondent. 2. This appeal has been filed by the appellants/defendants, aggrieved from the judgment and decree dated 19.07.2024 passed in 2 (RNT,J & MRK,J A.S. NO.503 OF 2024) O.S.No.85 of 2017 on the file of the XV Additional District Judge, Krishna District at Nuzvid, filed by the respondent/plaintiff for recovery of amount. 3. The suit was decreed in the following terms : “In the result, the suit is partly decreed with proportionate costs for Rs.39,97,400/-(Rupees thirty nine lakhs, ninety seven thousand and four hundred only) being the advance amount under agreement of sale dated 18.10.2014 as well as amount Rs.2,00,000/- spent by the plaintiff along with interest at 18% p.a., with subsequent interest at 12% p.a., on the principal amount of Rs.24,00,000/- (Rupees twenty four lakhs only) from the date of suit till the date of decree and thereafter at 6% p.a, till realization.” 4. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the parties have settled the matter out of Court. In pursuance of the said settlement, the appellants are ready to handover Demand Drafts (3 in Nos.) for an amount of Rs.59,00,000/- towards full and final settlement to the plaintiff/respondent. He further submits that the appeal may be closed by recording the settlement. 5. On 01-04-2025, the following order was passed : “Learned counsels for the parties submit that there was a settlement between the parties for an amount of Rs.59,00,000/- against the decree of the learned Court, which is under challenge in the present appeal. The decree was for the recovery of Rs.44,63,200/- along with interest. 3 (RNT,J & MRK,J A.S. NO.503 OF 2024) 2. Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo to that effect annexing copies of Demand Drafts. He submits that the aforesaid Demand Drafts are with him, and he is ready to handover them. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that he has no instructions to receive the aforesaid DDs., and prays for time to obtain instructions, as also for the appearance of the parties. 4. Post on 03.04.2025.” 6. Today, Sri Mangena Sree Rama Rao, learned counsel for the respondent/plaintiff, submits that the respondent, namely Vallabhaneni Ramprasad, is present before the Court. He further submits that the respondent has filed an execution petition for execution of the decree, which is under challenge in the present appeal and is pending before the Court of the XV Additional District Judge, Krishna District at Nuzvid. 7. We consider it appropriate to direct the parties to approach the Execution Court and file appropriate applications. The demand drafts may also be deposited before the said Court. The Execution Court, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the parties, shall pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. 8. With the above observation, the Appeal Suit is disposed of. 9. The interim order granted by this Court in I.A.No.1 of 2024 on 27.09.2024 stands vacated. 4 (RNT,J & MRK,J A.S. NO.503 OF 2024) No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J ______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J Date : 03.04.2025. RPD. 5 (RNT,J & MRK,J A.S. NO.503 OF 2024) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM (DISPOSED OF) APPEAL SUIT NO: 503 OF 2024 Date: 03.04.2025 RPD.