Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:37832 Court No. - 73 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 8516 of 2025 Applicant :- Sachin And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Bhishm Pal Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Vikas Budhwar,J. 1. Heard Sri Bhishm Pal Singh, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Indrajeet Yadav, learned AGA for the State. 2. In view of the order which is being proposed to be passed, notice is not being issued to the opposite party No. 2. 3. The applicants herein had earlier approached this Court while filing Application U/s 482 No. 1686 of 2025 in which on 21.01.2025, the following order was passed.- "1. Heard Sri D.S. Yadav, Advocate holding brief of Shri Bhishm Pal Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Sandeep Saxena, learned learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No. 707 of 2022 (Tanu Vs. Sachin and others) under Sections 354, 504, 506, IPC and 7/8 of POCSO Act, P.S.- Shikohabad, District- Firozabad, pending in the court of learned Additional Session Judge/ Special Judge POCSO Act, Court No. 3, Firozabad. 3. Contention of learned counsel for the applicants is that from the perusal of the statement of victim girl under Section 200 Cr.P.C., it is clear that absolutely vague allegation has been made and no offence under Section 354 and POCSO Act is made out. It is further submitted that now on pursuance of responsible persons of the society, parties have settled their dispute and compromise deed dated 23.12.2024 have entered between the parties. It is further submitted that original deed of compromise has already been filed before the court below and it is also prayed that on the basis of compromise, impugned proceeding may be quashed. 4. However, learned A.G.A. has submitted that the aforesaid compromise is yet to be verified by the court below, therefore, a direction may be issued to court below to verify the aforesaid compromise. 5. In view of the above, present application is disposed of with direction to learned court below to verify the aforesaid compromise after summoning the parties. 6. It is further directed that the aforesaid exercise shall be concluded by the court below within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order and for a period of two months, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants. 7. However, the applicants are granted liberty to file a fresh application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the main proceedings, if need arises." 4. Learned counsel for the applicants has invited attention towards Annexure-7 at page 42 and onwards reference whereof is at page 42A/42B and 43 that compromise stood verified by the court below on 29.01.2025. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that once the matter stands compromised between the parties then nothing remains to further proceeded with. 5. Considering the submissions made across the bar and looking into the fact that the parties have themselves compromised and the same stood verified on 29.01.2025. 6. Thus, this Court finds that there is no reason to proceed with the matter. 7. Accordingly, the application is allowed. 8. The proceedings of Complaint Case No. 707 of 2022 (Tanu Vs. Sachin and others), under Sections 354, 504, 506 IPC & Section 7/8 POCSO Act, Police Station Shikohabad, District Firozabad, pending in the Court of Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge, POCSO Act, Court No. 3, Firozabad be quashed. 9. Liberty is accorded to the opposite party No. 2 to prefer the application, if he is aggrieved of the order passed today. Order Date :- 18.3.2025 Rajesh Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad