Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2832 (RAJ)

MOHAMMAD AASIF S/O SHRI ABDUL JABBAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/428/2025 · 2025-02-14

Anil Kumar Upman

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:6728] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 428/2025 Mohammad Aasif S/o Shri Abdul Jabbar, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Rajiv Gandhi Colony, In Front Of 16 Number Tempo Stand Gali, In Front Of 6 Number Gali, Chandana Bhakar, Police Station Pratap Nagar, Jodhpur. (Rajasthan) (Presently Confined At Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Shekhawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 14/02/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.269/2024 registered at Special Crime and Cyber Crime Police Station, Commissionerate Jaipur, District Deputy Commissioner of Police Crime Commissionerate Jaipur (Rajasthan) for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 419, 406 & 120B of IPC and Sections 66C & 66D of IT Act. Investigation is being conducted for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 419, 406 & 120B of IPC and Section 66C & 66D of IT Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submit that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. Counsel submits that there is money dispute between the parties and same has been resolved amicably by the parties. Counsel further submits that there are no criminal antecedents of the petitioner. Petitioner is in custody [2025:RJ-JP:6728] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-428/2025] since 20.12.2024 and trial will take considerable time. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; absence of criminal antecedents of the petitioner; period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow these bail applications. 6. The bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Mohammad Aasif S/o Shri Abdul Jabbar shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /422