- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1980 WP No. 13708 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 13708 OF 2020 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: M/S. YOJAKA INDIA PVT LTD, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT D.NO 3-2B/43, 2ND FLOOR, ABCO TRADE CENTER, NH-17, KOTTARA CHOWKI, MANGALURU-575 006, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, SRI JAGADISH BOLOOR. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VENUGOPAL.M.S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, PORTS AND INLAND WATER TRANSPORT, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT AND APPELLATE AUTHORITY, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, PORTS AND INLAND WATER TRANSPORT, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGAURU-560 001. 3. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS, PORTS AND INLAND WATER TRANSPORT, PORTS AND FISHERIES DIVISION, UDUPI, 2ND FLOOR SHAMILI HALL, AMABALAPADY, UDUPI-576 102. 4. TECHNICAL BID EVALUATION COMMITTEE, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1980 WP No. 13708 of 2020 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF ENGINEER, C&B NORTH, DHARWAD-580 001. 5. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, NORTH ZONE, DHARWAD-580 001. 6. M/S. EMJAY CONSTRUCTIONS, NO.3/7A, CANAL 2ND F CROSS STREET, KAILPAUK GARDEN COLONY, KAILPAUK, CHENNAI, TAMILNADU-600 010. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA RAYAPPA., AGA FOR R1 TO 3; SRI. H.L.PRADEEP KUMAR., ADVOCATE FOR R6) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Venugopal.M.S., counsel for the petitioner has appeared in person. Counsel submits that a memo has been filed stating that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. Counsel therefore, submits that the memo may be - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:1980 WP No. 13708 of 2020 placed on record and the Writ Petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. When queried, counsel for the petitioner submits that a conscious decision is taken by him and the petitioner about infructuous of the Writ Petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same or file review petition. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner and the memo is placed on record. The Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 7