Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28317 (JHR)

ADARSH SAHNI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

W.P.(Cr.)/921/2024 · 2025-01-09

Navneet Kumar, Sujit Narayan Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI WP (Cr.) No.921 of 2024 Adarsh Sahni, aged about 21 years, son of Ganga Sahni, resident of Jalsar Raod, P.O. & P.S. Deoghar, District - Deoghar. ..... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Prison & Disaster Management, Govt. of Jharkhand, Project Bhawan, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S Dhurwa, District-Ranchi. 2. The Director General of Police, Jharkhand, having its office at Police Headquarters, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District-Ranchi. 3. The Union of India through its zonal director (Narcotic Control), Ranchi 4. The Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar, P.O. & P.S. Deoghar, District-Deoghar. 5. The Superintendent of Police, Deoghar, P.O. & P.S. Deoghar, District-Deoghar. 6. The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Deoghar, P.O. & P.S. Deoghar, District- Deoghar. 7. The A.S.I.-cum-Officer-in-Charge, Nagar Thana, Deoghar, P.O., P.S. & District - Deoghar. 8. The Jail Superintendent, Birsa Munda Central Jail, Hotwar, P.O. & P.S. - Khelgaon, District-Ranchi. …. Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVNEET KUMAR For the Petitioner : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Advocate Mr. Anurag Kashyap, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate ----- Order No.3: 9th January 2025 Mr. Pankaj Kumar, learned associate counsel of the Office of learned counsel Mr. Anurag Kashyap on instruction seeks leave of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. 2. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn and as such disposed of. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) (Navneet Kumar, J.) R.Kumar