Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28312 (RAJ)

KALYAN PRASAD v. BOARD OF REVENUE AJMER AND ORS

CW/9629/2011 · 2025-03-11

Mahendar Kumar Goyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:10989] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9629/2011 Kalyan Prasad (since deceased) through his legal heir: Shiv Dayal S/o Lt. Sh. Kalyan Prasad, aged 56 years, R/o Village Dhandhupura, Tehsil and Distt. Karauli ----Petitioner Versus 1.Board of Revenue, Rajasthan, Ajmer. 2.Revenue Appellate Authority, Sawai Madhopur. 3.District Collector, Karauli. Proforma Respondents 4.Ramcharan S/o Budhram 5.Purshottam S/o Sukha 6.Deendayal S/o Kalua 7.Rewti Prasad S/o Heera Lal 8.Magan Lal S/o Gajadhar 9.Kailash Chand S/o Raghunath 10.Kumher Chand S/o Sheoji 11.Deendayal S/o Heera Lal (since deceased) through his legal representatives: 11/1.Soto Devi Wife of Lt. Sh. Deendayal, aged 80 years, 11/2.Lajja Ram S/o Lt. Sh. Deendayal, aged 40 years, 11/3.Ramsahay S/o Lt. Sh. Deendayal, aged 32 years, 11/4.Dilip S/o Lt. Sh. Deendayal, aged 30 years, 11/5.Bhagwan Sahay S/o Lt. Sh. Deendayal, aged 28 years, 11/6.Raju S/o Lt. Sh. Deendayal, aged 18 years, 12.Dinesh Chand S/o Kalua 13.Ashok Kumar S/o Gulab 14.Bheem Sen S/o Ram Charan All are residents Dhandhupura, Tehsil and District Karauli. -------Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. J.P. Goyal, Sr. Adv. assisted by Ms. Meenal Bhargava Mr. Siddharth Singh Mr. Gaurav Sharma for Mr. Rinesh Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Neeraj Batra, GC assisted by Ms. Gunjan Chawla Mr. Virendra Singh HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order 11/03/2025 [2025:RJ-JP:10989] (2 of 2) [CW-9629/2011] This writ petition is disposed of in following terms as agreed and requested by the learned counsels for the respective parties:- 1. The order dated 04.03.2011 passed by the Board of Revenue, Rajasthan, Ajmer in Appeal No.11301/2000: Kalyan Prasad versus Ramcharan & Ors. is quashed and set aside. 2. The petitioner is held entitled for issuance of Patta. 3. The parties would abide by the terms of the compromise deed dated 18.12.2024 entered into in between them. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Manish/13