APHC010008712017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH^ AT AMARAVATI >/ot ^0 0® -x •V-*’" I: •m¥ (Special original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA si» TILHARI RAO KUNCHEAM FIRST APPEAL NO: 465 OF 2017 Appeal Under Section 96 of C.P.C. 28.11.2016 in O.S.No. 30/2012 cum-VI Additional District Judge; Kadapa. against the Judgment and Decree Dated on the file of the Court of the Family Court- Between: M/s. Mythrees Associates a partnership firm Represented by its Managing Partner T. Lava Kurriar S/o. T. Venkateswarlu (Late) Occupation Business having its Business Office Karakambadi Road, Tirupati, Chittoor 517501 Aged 45 years at 1-41, 1^* Floor, Andhra Pradesh. ...Appellant/Plaintiff AND 1. The Superintending Engineer, Operation Circle Yerramukkapalli Rail way Station Road Kadapa - 516 004 2. Vidyut Bhavan, Near Collector Bunglow 2. The Chairman Managing Director Corporate Office, Southern Power Distribution Company of A P Ltd., Raghavendra Nagar, Backside of Sreenivasa Kalyana Mandapams, Tiruchanoor 3. The Joint Director of Agricultural and Road, Tirupati - 517 501 Nodal Officer Kadapa, Kadapa District. 4. The District Collector Kadapa Kadapa District. .■.Respondents/Defendants <v Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondents: The Court made the following; SRI Y ANANTHA RAMAN SRI VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA SC FOR APSPDCL (RNT,J & |V1RK,J A.S. NO.465 OF 2017) RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM appeal suit NO: 4fi.^ OF ^DGMENT:- (per Hon’ble Sri This appeal has been filed aggrieved from the dismissal of the judgment and decree dated 28.11.2016 on the file of the Judge, Family Court Kadapa. Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) by the appellant/plaintiff, being suit filed for recovery of amount, by passed in O.S.No.30 of 2012 -cum-VI Additional District Court, 2. On 20.08.2024, the following order was passed ■‘Leaned counselfor the appellant is not available List the appeal on 10.09.2024. ” 3. On 10.09.2024, the following order was passed l-caned comsdfor the appellanl is ml available I ,s '-V-esemedihalMs.JyothiRamaAmmolu. learned oomse! eceived msiracnom to appear on behalfof the respondents I & 2 At hei recjiiest, list the appeal on 01.10.2024. ” 4. On 16.04.2025, the following order was passed “No representationfor the appellant 4. As last opportunity, post the matter afterfour weeks. ” In spite of the last counsel for the appellant to representation today and the 5. opportunity granted to the learned appear and argue the matter, there is no case has not been prosecuted. 2 (RNT,J & MRK,J A.S. N0.465 OF 2017) Sri Ashok Kondeti, learned counsel representing Sri Kota 6. Venkata Rama Rao, learned standing counsel for APSPDCL, is present. in view of the above, the Appeal Suit is dismissed “for want 7. of prosecution”. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. Sd/- M. RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To The Family Court-cum-VI Additional District Judge: Kadapa. (with records) The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. One CC to Sri Y Anantha Raman, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri Venkata Rama Rao Kota, SC for APSPDCL [OPUC] Two CD Copies 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. RAM HIGH COURT DATED:19/06/2025 JUDGMENT AS.No. 465 of 2017 ^ 0 8 SEP 2025 M DISMISSING THE APPEAL SUIT FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS I