2025:JHHC:16758 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.7826 of 2024 ------ 1.Sitaram Yadav, son of Kali Yadav 2.Ramdeo Yadav @ Ravindra Yadav, son of Sitaram Yadav 3.Anand Yadav @ Anand Kumar, son of Sitaram Yadav, resident of village Birjamu, PO Bagdo, PS Domchanch, District Koderma … … Petitioner(s) Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand. 3.Mamta Devi, wife of Sri Arjun Yadav and daughter of Sri Gango Yadav, resident of village Inderwa, PO Inderwa, PS Koderma, District Koderma … … Opposite Party(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Lakhan Yadav, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Sanat Kr. Jha, A.P.P. ----- 05/ 24.06.2025 I.A. No. 3960 of 2025 This interlocutory application filed for early hearing of this application is dismissed as the same is taken up. A.B.A. No.7826 of 2024 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 3. This anticipatory bail application under Section 482 and 484 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, has been preferred by the petitioners apprehending their arrest for offences registered under Sections 323, 341 and 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Koderma in connection with Complaint Case No. 868 of 2021. 4. Learned A.P.P. representing the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 5. Since the case arises of compliant there is no question of custodial interrogation. Further cognizance has already been taken and summons have been issued. 6. In view of the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of “Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar” reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273 and “Satender Kumar Antil 2025:JHHC:16758 2 vs. CBI and Anr.” reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51, I direct the petitioners to appear before the trial Court since there is no question of arrest in this case and take appropriate steps. 7. Accordingly, this Anticipatory Bail Application stand disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Tanuj/Cp-3