[2025:RJ-JP:33276] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12664/2025 Ashok Kumar Gupta, S/o Shri Murari Lal Gupta, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Village And Post Gordhanpura,tehsil Kotputli District Kotputli Behror. Presently Working As Teacher Grade Iii Level-2 In Government Upper Primary School, Thoseda, Block Thanagazi, District Alwar ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Collector Cum District Election Officer, Alwar, District Alwar 2. The Electoral Registration Officer (SDM), Thanagazi (064), District Alwar 3. Chief Block Education Officer, Block Rajgarh, District Al- war ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Pathak For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 22/08/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the controversy involved in the present case is squarely covered by an order dated 22.07.2025 passed by a Single Bench of this Court at principal seat, Jodhpur in batch of writ petitions led by S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12975/2025 : Ten Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2. Learned counsel, therefore, prays that the petitioner may be permitted to file a detailed representation before the competent authorities for redressal of his grievance(s). [2025:RJ-JP:33276] (2 of 2) [CW-12664/2025] 3. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation to the competent authorities of the department and the competent authorities of the department are directed to decide the same within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of such representation; and if the case of the petitioner falls within the purview of the law laid down by this Court in the case of Ten Singh (supra); the same shall be decided in terms of the judgment above. 4. The order has been passed based on the submissions made in the petition, the respondents would be free to examine the veracity of the submissions made in the petition and only in case, the averments made therein are found to be correct, the petitioner would be entitled to the relief sought. 5. Stay application and other pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of, accordingly. (MANEESH SHARMA),J Seema/20