Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:376 WP No. 1319 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 1319 OF 2021 (GM-WAKF) BETWEEN:
MANAGING COMMITTEE, THE JAMIA MASJID, KUNDAPURA TOWN, UDUPI DISTRICT - 576 201, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NAVEED AHMED., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS DEPARTMENT OF MINORITY WELFARE, HAJ AND WAKF, REP. BY ITS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, VIKAS SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001.
2.
THE KARNATAKA STATE BOARD OF AUQAF, NO.6, CUNNINGHAM ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 052.
REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER.
3.
SHRI H.MEERA SAHEB (RETD.), P.E.TEACHER, ADMINISTRATOR, JAMIA MASJID, KUNDAPURA TOWN, UDUPI DISTRICT - 576 201.
4.
DISTRICT WAKF OFFICER, DISTRICT WAKF OFFICE, 2ND FLOOR, 'A' BLOCK, D.C.OFFICE COMPLEX,
Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:376 WP No. 1319 of 2021
END POINT, MANIPAL - 576 104, UDUPI DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VIVEK RAJ., ADVOCATE FOR SRI P.USMAN., FOR R2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH 65(2) OF THE KARNATAKA WAKF ACT, 1995, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
Sri.Vivek Raj.M., counsel on behalf of Sri.P.Usman., for respondent No.2 has appeared in person.
2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Certiorari to quash the order dated 13.10.2020 passed by the second respondent in No.KBW/BLS/CMC/09/UDP/2012-13 appointing the third respondent as Administrator vide Annexure-A.
3. Heard the arguments and perused the Writ papers with care.
4. Suffice it to note that the impugned order was passed on 13.10.2020 appointing the third respondent as Administrator for a period of six months. Now we are in the
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:376 WP No. 1319 of 2021
month of January 2025. Due to efflux of time, the order has spent itself. Hence, nothing survives or consideration in the Writ Petition at this juncture. the Writ Petition is liable to be dismissed.
5. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is dismissed.
Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 19