In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh [158] CWP-4878-2025 Date of Decision: 26.03.2025 CHANDRA BHAN GULLIANI AND ANR. ..... PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ......RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESHWAR THAKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present: Mr. Nishant Mani, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, Ms. Svaneel Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, Mr. P.P. Chahar, Sr. Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, Mr. Saurabh Mago, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, Mr. Gaurav Bansal, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana and Mr. Karan Jindal, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate, Ms. Sharvi Dadhwal, Advocate, and Ms. Saanvi Singla, Advocate, for the respondent(s)-HSVP. *** SURESHWAR THAKUR , J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the instant petition, but in case the direction(s) is passed upon the respondents concerned, to consider the case of the present petitioners in terms of a relevant policy (Annexure P-6). 2. Since the learned Addl. Advocate General, Haryana does not oppose the said prayer, therefore, the instant writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the present petitioner to file a representation before the competent authority, who shall on receiving the said representation, shall proceed to expeditiously and most lawfully decide the same, but after hearing all affected persons concerned. 3. Disposed of accordingly. (SURESHWAR THAKUR) JUDGE (VIKAS SURI) JUDGE MARCH 26, 2025 ANJAL Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No ANJAL GUPTA 2025.03.27 11:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document