SURENDRA KUMAR BHATI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/3253/2025 · 2025-03-17
Ajit Kumar
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28302 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28302 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:39564 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3253 of 2025 Petitioner :- Surendra Kumar Bhati Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pramod Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. Petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the concerned competent authority disposing of his representation against transfer order earlier made from Bulandshahar to Lalitpur and this time now he has been transferred to Firzoabad.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that only two years to go of the retirement of the petitioner, therefore, as per prevalent policy, he may be adjusted either in home town or nearby placew of Delhi where the petitioner has permanent address. Learned Standing Counsel submits that when new transfer policy comes into force, petitioner will have liberty to make such request as per prevalent policy as contained for transfer to the places nearby his residence. In such above view of the matter, I decline to grant indulgence in the matter at this stage. New transfer policy is to be commenced, and therefore, government would be introducing new transfer policy for the year 2025-26. In the circumstances, therefore, petitioner would have an opportunity to make fresh representation whenever new policy comes into force. Decision taken by the authority under the order impugned will have no bearing in the event petitioner makes representation as per policy that may come for next session. Subject to what has been observed above, this petition is consigned to records at this stage.
Order Date :- 18.3.2025 Sanjeev Digitally signed by :- SANJEEV RANJAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad