THE MANGALORE CO OPERATIVE BUILDING SOCIETY LTD v. STATE OF KARNATAKA
WA/973/2024 · 2025-06-26
C M Joshi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28297 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28297 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22420-DB WA No. 973 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. V KAMESWAR RAO, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI WRIT APPEAL NO. 973 OF 2024 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
1.
THE MANGALORE CO-OPERATIVE BUILDING SOCIETY LTD., CLASSIC ORCADE 1ST FLOOR OPPOSITE PRABATH THEATRE K.S.RAO ROAD MANGALORE - 575 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY SRI PADMANABHA K S/O VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS …APPELLANT
(BY MS. ASHRITHA A. SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR SRI NARASIMHA RAJESH K.S., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO
Digitally signed by VASANTHA KUMARY B K Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22420-DB WA No. 973 of 2024
LABOUR DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA KARNATAKA - 560 001
2.
THE LABOUR INSPECTOR SUB-DIVISION - 1 KARMIKA BHAVANA DIARY CIRCLE BANNERAGHATTA ROAD BENGALURU - 560 002
3.
THE SENIOR LABOUR INSPECTOR 3RD CIRCLE MANGALORE K.D. DISTRICT - 575 001 …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI K.S. HARISH, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 27.02.2024 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN WRIT PETITION NO.29699/2015 (GM-RES) AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE PRAYER WHICH IS URGED IN THE WRIT PETITION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22420-DB WA No. 973 of 2024
CORAM: HON'BLE MR V KAMESWAR RAO, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C M JOSHI
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR V KAMESWAR RAO, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)
1. Ms. Ashritha A. Shetty, learned counsel for Mr. Narasimha Rajesh K.S., learned counsel for the appellant states that she has instructions to withdraw the writ appeal.
2. Submission is taken on record.
3. Dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of dismissal of the appeal, pending interlocutory applications, if any, do not survive for consideration and they stand accordingly disposed of.
Sd/- (V KAMESWAR RAO) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/- (C M JOSHI) JUDGE
BKV, List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14