IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-6418-2021 (O&M) Date of decision: 28.01.2025 M/s A.K. Overseas …. Petitioner Vs. Union of India and others …. Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: None for the petitioner. Ms. Mamta Singla Talwar, DAG, Haryana. ARUN PALLI, J (Oral) On January 17, 2023, this Court had passed the following order: “Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks time to file the replication to clarify that before 2020 when he was purchasing this unmanufactured tobacco, it was being assessed for sales tax purposes in Delhi and there is no objection raised by the authorities in Delhi. List this matter on 23.3.2023.” Office report indicates that replication has not been filed. None has appeared either on behalf of the petitioner to pursue the matter. That being so, this court is choice-less but to dismiss the petition for non prosecution. Dismissed for non prosecution. (ARUN PALLI) JUDGE (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE 28.01.2025 deepak Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR 2025.01.29 19:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document P & H High Court, Chandigarh