Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28289 (ALL)

RAJ SINGH v. THE STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/7322/2025 · 2025-03-20

Saral Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:41701 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7322 of 2025 Petitioner :- Raj Singh Respondent :- The State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bansh Raj Mishra,Harsh Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pratik Chandra Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Pratik Chandra, learned counsel for respondents. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that respondent no.3 is not refunding the tuition and admission fee as well as hostel fee amounting to Rs.92,755/- to the petitioner. In respect to his grievances, petitioner has submitted several representations to the respondent no.3, but respondent no.3 has not paid any heed to the request of the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents states that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to respondent no.3 to consider the grievance of the petitioner. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without adverting into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation alongwith certified copy of this order raising all his grievances before the respondent no.3-Registrar, Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, Banda within a period of one month from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent no.3 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of one month thereafter from the date he receives representation of the petitioner. Order Date :- 21.3.2025 Sattyarth Digitally signed by :- SATTYARTH ANAND High Court of Judicature at Allahabad