IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 290 MAHENDER AND OTHERS STATE OF HARYANA CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. Present : Mr Ms. Sheenu Sura, D.A.G., Haryana. Mr. Mandender Chauhan, Advocate for respondent No.2. MANISHA BATRA 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short No.708 dated 17.11.2020 registered under Sections 147, 149, 323, 325 and 506 of IPC, at Police Station Sirsa City, Dist proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 18.02.2024 (Annexure P-2). 2 . This Court vide order dated 25.0 appear before the trial Court to get their statements reco Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the learned Judicial Magistrate 1 On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M Date of decision: MAHENDER AND OTHERS Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA Mr. Mohit kakkar, Advocate for the Ms. Sheenu Sura, D.A.G., Haryana. Mr. Mandender Chauhan, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short-‘BNSS’) No.708 dated 17.11.2020 registered under Sections 147, 149, 323, 325 and 506 of IPC, at Police Station Sirsa City, District Sirsa and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 18.02.2024 2). This Court vide order dated 25.02 appear before the trial Court to get their statements reco Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Sirsa and got their statements recorded. the basis of the statements so recorded, learned IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH M No.10649 of 2025 Date of decision: 08.04.2025 …. Petitioners …. Respondents MANISHA BATRA , Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Sheenu Sura, D.A.G., Haryana. Mr. Mandender Chauhan, Advocate for respondent No.2. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya ‘BNSS’) for quashing of FIR No.708 dated 17.11.2020 registered under Sections 147, 149, 323, 325 and 506 rict Sirsa and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 18.02.2024 2.2025 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the , Sirsa and got their statements recorded. the basis of the statements so recorded, learned Magistrate has submitted Bharatiya for quashing of FIR No.708 dated 17.11.2020 registered under Sections 147, 149, 323, 325 and 506 rict Sirsa and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 18.02.2024 .2025 had directed the parties to rded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the , Sirsa and got their statements recorded. has submitted Jyoti 2025.04.09 10:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM report dated 24.03.2025 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel a have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. 6. Following the this Court in another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 this petition is allowed and No.708 dated 17.11.2020 registered under Sections 147, 149, 323, 325 and 506 of IPC, at Police Station Sirsa City, District Sirsa and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 18.02.2024 (Annexure P 08.04.2025 Jyoti-IV CRM-M No.10649 of 2025 report dated 24.03.2025 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 this petition is allowed and No.708 dated 17.11.2020 registered under Sections 147, 149, 323, 325 and 506 of IPC, at Police Station Sirsa City, District Sirsa and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise .2024 (Annexure P-2) are quashed qua the petitioners. (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No No.10649 of 2025 -2- report dated 24.03.2025 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. s well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and No.708 dated 17.11.2020 registered under Sections 147, 149, 323, 325 and 506 of IPC, at Police Station Sirsa City, District Sirsa and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise 2) are quashed qua the petitioners. (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No report dated 24.03.2025 to the effect that the compromise has been effected s well as counsel for respondent No.2 In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme , this petition is allowed and No.708 dated 17.11.2020 registered under Sections 147, 149, 323, 325 and 506 of IPC, at Police Station Sirsa City, District Sirsa and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise Jyoti 2025.04.09 10:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document