APHC010402122025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) % •w T:< MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE O Si PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 21015 OF 2025 Between: 1. Pandraju Lakshmi Prasanna, W/o. Srinivasa Rao Aged 42 years, Occ: R/o. F-3, Lakshmi Towers, Ramavarappadu, Home maker, Vijayawada, NTR District. 2. Pandraju Srinivasa Rao, S/o. Seshagiri Rao, Aged 50 years, Occ: Realtor, R/o. F-3, Lakshmi Towers, Ramavarappadu, Vijayawada, NTR District. ...Petitioners AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary to the Government, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Guntur District at Guntur. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Guntur District at Guntur. 4. The Subinspector of Police, Mangalagiri Police Station, Mangalagiri, Guntur District. 5. The Station House Officer, Mangalagiri Police Station, Mangalagiri Guntur District. 6. Dasari Raju, S/o. Babu Rao, R/o. D.No. 6-141, Lutharan Church Road, Nidamarru, Mangalagiri, Guntur District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents particularly 4**" and 5^^ respondents in insisting petitioners to appear before their authority and yield to the terms of respondent No.6 as illegal, irregular, irrational, without any authority or sanction of law, violative of principles of natural justice and offends Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents, particularly 4‘^ and 5"^ respondents to interfere in any manner with petitioners^personal life and liberty them to appear before their authority for settling terms with Respondent not nor insist No.6 in any aspect. lA NO: 1 OF 2Q2«> Petition under Section 151 C.PC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents, particularly 4*^ and respondents not to interfere in any manner with petitioners’ personal life and liberty petitioners to appear before nor insist the their authority for settling any terms with respondent No.6, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: M/s. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5 : SRI V. FAROOQ, ASST.GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.6 : NONE APPEARED The Court made the following order: APHC010402122025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 21015/2025 [3396] Between: 1.PANDRAJU LAKSHMI PRASANNA, W/0. SRINIVASA RAO AGED 42 YEARS, OCC HOME MAKER, R/0. F-3, LAKSHMI TOWERS, RAMAVARAPPADU, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. 2.PANDRAJU SRINIVASA RAO,, S/O. SESHAGIRI RAO, AGED 50 YEARS, OCCREALTOR, R/0. F-3, LAKSHMI TOWERS, RAMAVARAPPADU, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1.THE STATE OF AP, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR DISTRICT AT GUNTUR. HOME SECRETARIAT, 3.THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR DISTRICT AT GUNTUR. 4.THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANGALAGIRI POLICE STATION, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MANGALAGIRI POLICE STATION, MANGALAGIRI GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6.DASARI RAJU, S/O. BABU RAO, R/0. D.NO. 6-141, LUTHARAN CHURCH ROAD, NIDAMARRU, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for; 2 .... a) Issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents particularly particularly 4^^ and 5^" respondents in insisting petitioners to appear before their authority and yield to the terms of respondent No. 6 as illegal, irregular, irrational, without any authority or sanction of law, violative of principles of natural justice and offends Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents, particularly 4^^ and 5^^ respondente to interfere in any manner with petitioners personal appear before their authority for settling terms with Respondent No. 6 in any aspect ” 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader written instructions, would submit that, based Respondent No.6, Police called the Petitioners far, no case has been registered against the Petitioners. Ms.Nimmagadda Revathi, learned for Home, on on the complaint given by for preliminary enquiry and so 3. counsel for the Petitioners would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition i However, Police are directed to follow due presence of the Petitioners relating to the Crime them. There shall be no order as to costs. IS disposed of. process of law to secure the if any. registered against As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. Sd/- N. NAGAMMA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// i To, Secretary to the Government, Home Department State 2 Th^sunpr t Amaravati. Guntur District . The Superintendent of Police. Guntur District at Guntur d. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Guntur District 4. The Sub Inspector of Police Guntur District. Guntu® District”''"® Station, Mangalagiri 6. One CC to M/s. Nimmagadda Revathi, Advocate [OPUCl R tT rn%‘° of Andhra Pradesh o. Two CD Copies at Guntur. Mangalagiri Police Station, Mangalagiri, [OUT] O r\ r- HIGH COURT DATED:11/08/2025 ORDER WP NO. 21015 OF 2025 disposing of the W P WITHOUT COSTS