Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28283 (RAJ)

SRIMATI KALI DEVI D/O RAMPHOOL v. RAMKARAN MEENA S/O KALAYAN MEENA

CRES/946/2024 · 2025-02-07

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:5530] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 946/2024 Srimati Kali Devi D/o Ramphool, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Village Karolan Ghati, Via Luniawas, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Ramkaran Meena S/o Kalayan Meena, R/o Village Trilokpura, Dareda-Ki-Dhani, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur. 2. Rampal Meena S/o Ramnath Meena, R/o Village Birajpura, Tehsil Bassi, Jaipur. (Deceased During Pendency Of Suit) 2/1. Smt Dhanni Devi W/o Late Rampal Meena, R/o Village Birajpura, Tehsil Bassi, Jaipur. 2/2. Mangilal S/o Late Rampal Meena, R/o Village Birajpura, Tehsil Bassi, Jaipur. 2/3. Kumari Pholi D/o Late Rampal Meena, R/o Village Birajpura, Tehsil Bassi, Jaipur. 2/4. Kumari Sita D/o Late Rampal Meena, R/o Village Birajpura, Tehsil Bassi, Jaipur. 3. Sub Registrar, Office Bassi, Tehsil Bassi, Jaipur. 4. Collector, Jaipur, District Jaipur Representative State Government, Office Collectorate Building Banipark Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhishek Bhardwaj with Mr. Shantnu Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gopal Krishna Sharma with Mr. Akshay Sharma and Mr. Abhinav Srivastava HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 07/02/2025 1. During course of arguments, learned counsel for respondent- non-applicant submits that after dismissal of civil second appeal on 07.03.2024, the respondents-non-applicant have sold the [2025:RJ-JP:5530] (2 of 2) [CRES-946/2024] property and they are no more in possession. He submits that the decree has already been satisfied and the execution proceedings have been closed. 2. Learned counsel for applicant-appellant after considering the subsequent events submits that he offers to withdraw the instant restoration application, hence, same be dismissed as withdrawn. 3. Having considered aforesaid, the restoration application with all pending application(s), if any, stands dismissed as withdrawn. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /38