- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:923 CRL.P No. 7685 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 7685 OF 2021 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. JAYARAMU, S/O. LATE. SRI. RAMANNA GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, NO. 123, 4TH CROSS, 1ST MAIN, NEAR HULIYURAMMA TEMPLE, ESHWARI NAGARI, HOSAKEREHALLI, BENGALURU - 560 085 2. SMT. GANGADEVI G R W/O. JAYARAM, AGEDA BOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT NO. 123, 4TH CROSS, 1ST MAIN, NEAR HULIYURAMMA TEMPLE, ESHWARI NAGAR, HOSAKEREHALLI, BENGALURU - 560 085 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. LAKSHMIPATHI V.M., ADVOCATE (AB)) AND: STATE BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, GIRINAGAR POLICE STATION, BENGALURU URBN, BENGALURU - 560 085, REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, HCGP) Digitally signed by SWAPNA V Location: high court of karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:923 CRL.P No. 7685 of 2021 THIS CRL.P. IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTICE DATED 24.09.2021 OF THE RESPONDENT GIRINAGAR P.S., AT ANNEXURE-A. THIS CRL.P., COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners is absent. No representation, even when the matter is passed over twice and again called at 1.16 pm. The petition is of the year 2021. The matter is listed for the fourth time for compliance of office objections, even though office objections are not complied with. The order sheet dated 28.10.2024 reads as under: "Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. There is no representation. The petition is of the year 2021. The matter is listed for third time for compliance of office objections. Inspite of that the office objections are not complied with. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:923 CRL.P No. 7685 of 2021 I do not find any reason to adjourn the matter. However, to afford a final opportunity, a week's time is granted to comply with the office objections. List this matter after one week." It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the matter. I do not find any reason to adjourn the matter. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. SD/- (M G UMA) JUDGE BH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3