JYOTIKA SHARMA v. RAJPAL SINGH ALIAS RAJPAL SINGH SIDHU
CR/1158/2025 · 2025-07-17
Suvir Sehgal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28273 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28273 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CR-1158-2025
287 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-1158-2025 Date of Decision :-17.07.2025 Jyotika Sharma .......Petitioner Versus Rajpal Sidhu @ Rajpal Singh Sidhu .......Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Pranav Agnihotri, Advocate for the respondent. **** SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (ORAL)
1. Counsel for the respondent states that the present petition has become infructuous as the petitioner has vacated the premises and handed back the possession.
2. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. 17.07.2025 (SUVIR SEHGAL) Brij JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No BRIJ MOHAN 2025.07.18 13:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh