Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28272 (ALL)

VINOD KUMAR PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WPIL/531/2025 · 2025-03-10

Chandra Kumar Rai

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:35265 Court No. - 50 Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 531 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Govind Narayan Tiwari,Gulab Chandra Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pradeep Singh Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Nand Lal Maurya, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Mr. Pradeep Singh, learned counsel for the respondent- Gaon Sabha. 2. The instant public interest litigation has been filed for the following relief: "writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding / directing the respondent no.2 to decide, made an application dated 7.9.2024 within stipulated period." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the earlier public interest litigation no.1066 of 2024 filed on behalf of the petitioner was disposed of vide order dated 27.5.2024 with liberty to the petitioner to approach the authority concern for redressal of his grievance. He further submitted that in pursuance of the order of this Court dated 27.5.2024, an application was filed before Tahsildar dated 7.9.2024 for giving effect to the order passed in the proceeding under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. 4. Learned Standing Counsel and Counsel for the gaon sabha submitted that instant public interest litigation is not maintainable as the earlier public interest litigation filed for the same relief has already been disposed of vide order dated 27.5.2024. 5. I have considered the argument advanced by learned counsel for the parties and perused the records. 6. There is no dispute about the fact that the order for ejectment and damages has been passed in the proceeding under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. 7. Earlier public interest litigation no.1066 of 2024 filed by the petitioner was not entertained, as such, the instant public interest litigation is not maintainable. 8. Under Para 460 of U.P. Revenue Court Manual, procedure has been prescribed for implementation / execution of the order passed in the proceeding under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. 9. Considering the entire facts and circumstances, no interference is required in the matter. 10. The instant public interest litigation is dismissed accordingly. Order Date :- 11.3.2025 Rameez Digitally signed by :- RAMEEZ AHMED High Court of Judicature at Allahabad