RAJ KUMAR AGARWAL ANDORS v. STATE MEDICAL AND HEALTHORS
CW/8168/2016 · 2025-03-28
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28259 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28259 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:14334] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8168/2016
1. Raj Kumar Agarwal S/o Shri Ram Sahai, aged about 36 years, R/o Plot No. 181-B, 10B Scheme Gopalpura Bye Pass Road, Jaipur.
2. Rajesh Sharma S/o Shri Radheyshyam Sharma, aged about 33 years, R/o Village Khera Langan Pure, Post Jatwara, Tehsil Laxmangarh, District Alwar.
3. Paras Kumar Jain S/o Nathu Lal Jain, aged about 36 years, R/o Near Sitaram Temple Neemic Mata Scheme, Dewali, Udaipur.
4. Vinod Kumar Jain S/o Late Trilok Chand Jain, R/o Shanti Niwas, R/o Neemich Khera Choriya Dewali, Udaipur.
5. Rajaram Jat S/o Shri Chhoga Lal Jat, aged about 42 years, R/o Village Karesiya Ki Dhani Post Dawadawas, Tehsil Duni, District tonk.
6. Chandrahas Sain S/o Shri Banwari Lal Sain, aged 44 years, R/o Gurjar Mohalla, ward No.15 Kherli, District Alwar. ----Petitioners Versus
1. The State of Rajasthan through Secretary Medical, Health and Family Welfare Department, Government of Rajasthan Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Additional Director, (Administration), Medical and Health Services, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3. Chief Medical & Health Officer, District Tonk.
4. Chief Medical & Health Officer, District Jaipur.
5. Chief Medical & Health Officer, District Alwar.
6. Chief Medical & Health Officer, District Udaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Chander Shekhar fore Mr. Mukesh Kumar Goyal For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order 28/03/2025
[2025:RJ-JP:14334] (2 of 2) [CW-8168/2016]
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that present matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(SAMEER JAIN),J Neeru/48