Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28258 (BOM)

RAMESH POPAT GIRAMKAR AND ANOTHER v. TOPAJI BAPU GIRAMKAR AND ANOTHER

CA/10186/2024 · 2025-01-02

Shri S G Chapalgaonkar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Tauseef 22-CA.10186.2024.odt IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10186 OF 2024 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10186 OF 2024 IN IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION (CRA) NO.125 OF 2024 CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION (CRA) NO.125 OF 2024 Ramesh Popat Giramkar & Anr. Ramesh Popat Giramkar & Anr. ...Applicants ...Applicants Versus Versus Topaji Bapu Giramkar & Anr. Topaji Bapu Giramkar & Anr. …Respondents …Respondents WITH WITH CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION (CRA) NO.125 OF 2024 CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION (CRA) NO.125 OF 2024 _____________________________________________________ Adv. Vinayak P. Narwade for Applicants. Adv. V. P. Suryawanshi for R/1. _____________________________________________________ CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR DATE : 2nd JANUARY 2025 P.C.:- CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10186 OF 2024 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10186 OF 2024:-:- 1. Heard learned Advocate appearing for respective parties. 2. There is marginal delay of two days in filing revision application. Considering reasons as stated, the delay deserves to be condoned. Accordingly, application is allowed. Delay of two days is hereby condoned. CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION (CRA) NO.125 OF 2024 CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION (CRA) NO.125 OF 2024:-:- 3. Mr. Narwade, learned Advocate appearing for Applicants after arguing for some time, on instructions, seeks permission to 1 of 2 2025:BHC-AUG:103 Tauseef 22-CA.10186.2024.odt withdraw the civil revision application. Civil revision application stands disposed of as withdrawn. (S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.) 2 of 2