Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28258 (AP)

TATA VIJAYA LAKSHMI PRASANNA KUMAR v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/20675/2025 · 2025-08-06

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010401832025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 20675/2025 Between: 1. TATA VIJAYA LAKSHMI PRASANNA KUMAR, S/O.SATYANARAYANA, AGED 44, YEARS, OCC GOVT.HOSPITAL DOCTOR,, R/O.D.NO.2-53, TATA VARI STREET, OPP BRAHMAMGARI TEMPLE, PEDAVEGI VILLAGE, PEDAVEGI MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ELURU DISTRICT. ELURU. 3. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ELURU DIVISION, ELURU DISTRICT 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PEDAVEGI POLICE STATION, ELURU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ order, or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of mandamus and declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 4 are highly illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law and clear violation of Articles 14 and 21 Constitution of India and principles of natural 2 Justice and consequently to direct the respondents 3 and 4 are not interfere into the petitioners personal life without there being any crime registering against the petitioner and not to call the police station frequently and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents 3 and 4 are not interfere into the petitioner’s personal life without there being any crime registering against the petitioner and not to call the police station frequently pending disposal of the Writ Petitioner and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MANDA VENKATESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue an appropriate Writ order, or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of mandamus and declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 4 are highly illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law and clear violation of Articles 14 and 21 Constitution of India and principles of natural Justice and consequently to direct the respondents 3 and 4 are not interfere into the petitioners personal life without there being any crime registering against the petitioner and not to call the police station frequently and pass...…” 2. Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions would submit that they have submitted a crime has been registered against the petitioner in Crime No.211 of 2024, under Section 102 3 Cr.P.C of Pedavegi Police Station. The police have called the petitioner for preliminary enquiry in the above said crime. 3. Sri M.Venkateswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions made, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 07.08.2025 MH 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 148 W.P.No.20675 of 2025 Dated.07.08.2025 MH