Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28254 (MAD)

Mr.P.Gajendran v. The Presiding Officer,

WP/30253/2015 · 2025-03-13

M Dhandapani

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.30253 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 13.03.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANI W.P.No.30253 of 2015 P.Gajendran ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Presiding Officer III Additional Labour Court Chennai. 2. The Management of Sri Ramachandra Hospital Porur, Chennai 600 116. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the award dated 03.09.2014 passed by the 1st respondent in I.D.No.53 of 2008, quash the same in so far as depriving the petitioner the relief of reinstatement, with continuity of service, back wages and other attendant benefits and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to reinstatement the petitioner with continuity of service, back wages and all other attendant benefits, after adjusting the amounts already paid to him, award costs. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Ajoy Khose For Respondents : Court – R1 Mr.A.Jenasenan for R2 ***** Page No.1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.30253 of 2015 ORDER This Petition has been filed seeking to quash the award dated 03.09.2014 passed by the 1st respondent in I.D.No.53 of 2008. 2. Seeking to reinstate the petitioner with full back wages, continuity of service and all other attendant benefits, he raised an industrial dispute u/s.2A(2) of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 before the Labour Cout and the Labour Court vide order dated 03.10.2014, has directed the management to pay lumpsum compensation of Rs.3,34,200/- to the petitioner / workman. Challenging the same, the present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner / workman. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the second respondent submitted that during the pendency of this writ petition the matter was amicably settled between the parties and second respondent is ready to pay a sum of Rs.1,25,000/- in full quit as compensation to the petitioner, since the entire award amount has already been paid to the employee. Page No.2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.30253 of 2015 4. In view of the fair submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court directs the second respondent management to pay a sum of Rs.1,25,000/- as full quit to the petitioner within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. With the above direction and observation, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 13.03.2025 Index : Yes / No Speaking order / Non-speaking order Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No rap Page No.3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.30253 of 2015 M.DHANDAPANI, J. rap To The Presiding Officer III Additional Labour Court Chennai. W.P.No.30253 of 2015 13.03.2025 Page No.4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis