Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28243 (HP)

MEENA PATIYAL v. STATE OF HP

EX.P./1388/2024 · 2025-03-27

Sushil Kukreja, Tarlok Singh Chauhan

Special Leave Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:HHC:7981 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Execution Petition No.1388 of 2024 Date of decision: 27.03.2025 Meena Patiyal ….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. ….Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting ?1 No. For the Petitioner: Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Mr. Navlesh Verma, Ms. Sharmila Patial, Mr. Sushant Kaprate, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Raj Negi, Deputy Advocate General. Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge(Oral): Even though, the respondents have filed compliance affidavit, however the same goes to indicate that the respondents have undertaken to comply with the judgment subject to the outcome of SLP filed in Execution Petition No.423 of 2023, titled as Jameet Singh vs. State. It is not permissible as the order passed by this Court was not conditional or in any way made subject to the outcome of Jasmeet Singh’s case. 2. In the given facts and circumstances, we deem it appropriate to dispose of this petition by directing the respondents to 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2 comply with the judgment passed by this Court as undertaken in the accompanying instructions without any condition and the same shall not be subject to the outcome of SLP filed in Jasmeet Singh’s case. Ordered accordingly. ( Tarlok Singh Chauhan ) Judge ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge March 27, 2025 (reena)