Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28242 (KAR)

JAVARASHETTY v. A P SHIVAKUMAR

CRL.A/1629/2022 · 2025-01-13

Shivashankar Amarannavar

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1122 CRL.A No. 1629 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1629 OF 2022 BETWEEN: JAVARASHETTY S/O LATE MADASHETTY AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS RESIDING AT SRIKANTAPURI EXTENSION, NANJANGUD TOWN MYSURU - 571 301. …APPELLANT (BY SRI MANJUNATH N D, ADVOCATE – ABSENT) AND: A P SHIVAKUMAR AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS L.I.C. EMPLOYEE L.I.C. OF INDIA CHAMARAJANAGARA - 571 313. …RESPONDENT THIS CRL.A IS FILED UNDER SECTION 374 OF Cr.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 21.01.2022 PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU IN CRL.A.No.166/2020, AND CONFIRM THE ORDER OF CONVICTION DATED 19.10.2020 PASSED BY THE II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, IN C.C.No.1139/2017 AND ETC., THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR Digitally signed by LAKSHMINARAYANA MURTHY RAJASHRI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1122 CRL.A No. 1629 of 2022 ORAL JUDGMENT 1. Learned counsel for appellant is not present. None appears for the appellant. 2. The appeal is listed today for the fifth time for compliance of office objections. Inspite of granting sufficient time, office objections are not complied. It appears, that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE LRS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6