Ct. No.4 M/L 07.07.2025 (Naba) 02 W.P.C.T. 63 of 2021 Commissioner of Central Tax, CGST and Central Excise, Howrah Commissionerate Vs. Mihir Sen Barman & Ors. Mr. Tapan Bhanja ...for the Petitioner Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Mr. A.N. Misra ...for the Respondents 1. The matter has been listed at the instance of the learned counsel for the petitioner who points out certain typographical errors of inadvertence which have crept into the order dated 12.06.2025, whereby the writ petition was disposed of. 2. Upon submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner the errors are apparent. Instead of ‘respondents’, the order finds mention of ‘petitioner’ in paragraph nos. 4 and 5. 3. The word ‘petitioner’ appearing in these paragraphs be read as ‘respondents’. 4. Insofar as paragraph no.17 is concerned, instead of ‘Rule 15’, mentioned therein, it should be ‘sub- Rule 15’. 5. Let ‘Rule 15’ be read as ‘sub-Rule’ in paragraph 17 of the order. 6. The order stands modified as above. (Madhuresh Prasad, J.) (Supratim Bhattacharya, J.)