APHC010008622020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3367] MONDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V SRINIVAS FIRST APPEAL NO: 27/2020 Between: 1. MANDALAPU DAMODHARA RAO, S/O. VISHNUMURTHY HINDU, MALE, AGED 65 YEARS, CULTIVATION, R/O. D.NO. 2-107B, GUDIPADU VILLAGE. MUSUNURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. AND ...APPELLANT AND 1. VEGUNTA KRISHNA MOHAN, S/O LATE MADHUSUDHANA RAO, HINDU, MALE, AGED 66 YEARS, BUSINESS, R/O D.NO.22C-11-43, CHUNDURU VARI VEEDHI, POWERPET, ELURU, W.G.DT. 2. VEGUNTA MADAN MOHAN, S/O LATE MADHUSUDHANA RAO, HINDU, MALE, AGED 61 YEARS, BUSINESS AND EMPLOYEE, R/O. C/O. KOLLI JNANA PRASAD, D.NO.4- 83, NAGA DEVATHA TEMPLE STREET, SATRAMPADU, ELURU MANDAL, W.G.DT. ...RESPONDENT(S): pleased to set-aside judgement and decree Dt. 05.11.2019 (Fifth day of November Two Thousand Nineteen) dismissing 0.S.No. 38/2015 on the file of the Hon'ble Principal District Judges' Court, W.G, Eluru and allow this appeal by decreeing the suit with costs althrough 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant stay of operation of Decree and Judgement Dt. 05.11.2019 (Fifth Day of November, Two Thousand Nineteen) and passed in O.S.No. 38/2015 on the file of Principal District Judges' Court, W.G. District, Eluru as far as directing the Petitioner/Appellant/Plaintiff to pay to the respondents/defendants a sum of Rs. 64,881/-towards costs of the suit pending disposal of the above appeal in the ends of justice Counsel for the Appellant: 1. C VENKAIAH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS APPEAL SUIT No.27 of 2020 JUDGMENT: Today, when the matter is taken up hearing, Sri C.Venkaiah, learned counsel for the appellant, appeared virtually and sought permission of this Court to not press the present appeal. He also filed a memo dated 14.07.2025 in the Registry to that effect. 2. Perused the said memo. 3. Permission, as sought for, is accorded. 4. Accordingly, the present Appeal Suit is dismissed as not pressed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS Date: 21.07.2025 JLV 4 183 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS APPEAL SUIT No.27 of 2020 Date: 21.07.2025 JLV