Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:2432 WP No. 18256 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 18256 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
M.DINESH SHETTY S/O ANANDA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT 262-C-4/9, SHRI SAI MANGAL, SHRI SAI MANGAL PANDYA ROAD, VADERHOBALI, KUNDAPURA TALUK, UDUPI - 576 201. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ARVIND., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. MOHAN KUMAR.D., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA CO-OPERATIVE DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001.
(REP BY SECRETARY).
2.
REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, NO.1, ALI ASKER ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001.
3.
DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, RAJATHADRI, 'A' BLOCK, 1ST FLOOR, MANIPAL-576 104.
4.
KUNDAPURA BAR ASSOCATION (REGD)., REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, KUNDAPURA, UDUPI DISTRICT - 576 201.
Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:2432 WP No. 18256 of 2021
5.
Y.SHARATH KUMAR SHETTY ADVOCATE, HEAD OF FACT FINDING COMMITTEE, KUNDAPURA COURT COMPLEX, KUNDAPURA - 576 201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.V.KRISHNA., ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO 3;
SRI. K.C.ARIGA., ADVOCATE FOR R4;
R5-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
Sri.Arvind., counsel on behalf of Sri.Mohankumara.D., for the petitioner and Sri.Chandranath Ariga.K., counsel for respondent No.4 have appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a memo has been filed stating that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. Counsel therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. When queried, counsel Sri.Arvind., submits that a conscious decision is taken by the advocate on record and the
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:2432 WP No. 18256 of 2021
petitioner to withdraw the Writ Petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same or file a review petition. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner and the memo is placed on record. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 3 Sl No.: 34