1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 346 of 2025 1. Shrikant Yadav S/o Toran Ram Yadav Aged About 42 Years Posted And Working As Sachiv At Graam Panchayat Moodpar, Block- Mungeli, Distt. Mungeli, C.G. 2. Madhaw Sahu S/o Sakharam Sahu Aged About 37 Years Posted And Working As Sachiv At Graam Panchayat Setganga, Block- Mungeli, Distt. Mungeli, C.G. 3. Chitranand Prasad Jaiswal S/o Govind Rasad Jaiswal Aged About 38 Years Posted And Working As Sachiv At Graam Panchayat Bodtara Kala, Block- Lormi, Distt. Mungeli, C.G. 4. Smt. Laxmi Kashyap W/o Laxmi Prasad Kashyap Aged About 34 Years Posted And Working As Sachiv At Graam Panchayat Mohtara Kurmi, Block- Lormi, Distt. Mungeli, C.G. 5. Rupendra Kumar Patel S/o Munnalal Patel Aged About 44 Years Posted And Working As Sachiv At Graam Panchayat Khaparidih, Block- Lormi, Distt. Mungeli, C.G. 6. Toopesh Kumar Sahu S/o Rajendra Sahu Aged About 38 Years Posted And Working As Sachiv At Graam Panchayat Padampur, Block- Mungeli, Distt. Mungeli, C.G. 7. Manoj Kumar Satyam S/o Indra Kumar Satyam Aged About 42 Years Posted And Working As Sachiv At Graam Panchayat Silli, Block- Mungeli, Distt. Mungeli, C.G. 8. Bhagwan Das Bhaskar S/o Bhuruva Ram Bhaskar Aged About 43 Years Posted And Working As Sachiv At Graam Panchayat Dabo, Block- Mungeli, Distt. Mungeli, C.G. 2 9. Bhupendra Kumar Kashyap S/o Tulsiram Kashyap Aged About 38 Years Posted And Working As Sachiv At Graam Panchayat Lormi, Block- Lormi, Distt. Mungeli, C.G. 10. Ramashankar Kashyap S/o Gopal Prasad Kashyap Aged About 43 Years Posted And Working As Sachiv At Graam Panchayat Navagaon Vekant, Block- Lormi, Distt. Mungeli, C.G. 11. Subhash Kumar Bhargav S/o Pyarelal Bhargav Aged About 46 Years Posted And Working As Sachiv At Graam Panchayat Parasvara, Block- Lormi, Distt. Mungeli, C.G. 12. Dhanesh Kumar Jogansh S/o Latel Das Jogansh Aged About 38 Years Posted And Working As Sachiv At Graam Panchayat Saraipatera, Block- Lormi, Distt. Mungeli, C.G. 13. Omprakash Maravi S/o Bhikham Singh Maravi Aged About 36 Years Posted And Working As Sachiv At Graam Panchayat Baghani Bhanvar, Block- Lormi, Distt. Mungeli, C.G. 14. Shiku Kumar Sahu S/o Chaitram Sahu Aged About 44 Years Posted And Working As Sachiv At Graam Panchayat Kughurtal, Block- Lormi, Distt. Mungeli, C.G. 15. Mahendra Kumar Sahu S/o Niranjan Sahu Aged About 38 Years Posted And Working As Sachiv At Graam Panchayat Phoolwari, Block- Mungeli, Distt. Mungeli, C.G. 16. Rajesh Kumar Sahu S/o Murit Ram Sahu Aged About 45 Years Posted And Working As Sachiv At Graam Panchayat Jalli, Block- Mungeli, Distt. Mungeli, C.G. 17. Gyanendra Kashyap S/o Bhole Prasad Kashyap Aged About 37 Years Posted And Working As Sachiv At Graam Panchayat Jhajhpuri Khurd, Block- Mungeli, Distt. Mungeli, C.G. 18. Tukeshwari Tiwari D/o Ashok Tiwari Aged About 35 Years Posted And Working As Sachiv At Graam Panchayat Suretha, Block- Mungeli, Distt. Mungeli, C.G. ... Petitioners versus 3 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Panchaya And Rural Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District - Raipur, C.G. 2. Director Directorate Of Pnchayat, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, C.G. 3. Joint Director Division Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, C.G. 4. Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Mungeli, District Mungeli, C.G. 5. Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Mungeli, District Mungeli, C.G. 6. Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Lormi, District Mungeli, C.G. ... Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Pramod Ramteke, Advocate For Respondents : Ms. Akankasha Verma, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 17/01/2025 1. Heard. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are working on the post of Graam Panchayat Sachiv on monthly basis at collector rate in various Schools/Hostels & Ashrams and they are entitled for grant of pay scale as per circular dated 18th July, 2018 issued by respondent No.1/State Government and therefore, they may be permitted to file representation before respondents No. 2 to 4 for redressal of their grievances and direction may be issued to the said authority to decide the same expeditiously. 3. Prayer appears to be fair and reasonable. 4 4. In view of above, the petitioners are permitted to file representation before respondents No. 2 to 4. If such representation is made by the petitioners within 15 days from today, respondents No. 2 to 4 shall consider and decide the case of the petitioners in the light of circular dated 18th July, 2018 preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order along with representations of the petitioners. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and authority concerned would be at liberty to decide the representations of the petitioners in accordance with law. 6. With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands finally disposed of. 7. No order as to cost(s). Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) JUDGE vaishali Digitally signed by VAISHALI LUCKY NAGARIA Date: 2025.01.20 15:05:53 +0530